We highly recommend a new short film from Business Insider on Brazil's shift to a green harvest and why the outdated practice of cane burning persists in the United States. The gist is that the American industry is fully equipped to stop burning, but the status quo is cheaper, faster, easier. Simply put, there are no regulations to incentivize or require green harvesting here in the U.S. Our campaign exists to change that dynamic.

With our campaign bearing down on them—and in the aftermath of Dr. Michée Lachaud's study establishing a statistically significant link between sugarcane burning and increased asthma incidence rates among low-income, predominantly Black Florida communities—U.S. Sugar has engaged Tuskegee University and Florida A&M University to study the impacts of sugarcane burning.

A new study has established a statistically significant link between sugarcane burning and increased asthma incidence rates among low-income, predominantly Black Florida communities.

Conducted for Friends of the Everglades by Dr. Michée Lachaud—an agricultural, environmental, and resource economist associated with Florida A&M University in Tallahassee—the study analyzed physician-diagnosed asthma cases alongside environmental factors and PM2.5 emissions, including from sugarcane burning. Dr. Lachaud is preparing to submit the study for publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

The most important takeaway from our review of the House and Senate summaries: it's an extension of the status quo, a set of tweaks that both Big Sugar—and sugar-using companies—can get behind. Both versions bolster federal support for Big Sugar. Neither takes on cane burning or the Florida sugar industry's toxic impact on water, the Everglades, and coastal communities and businesses.

Few global industries avoid accountability like the sugar industry. That's the most important lens through which to read a haunting new work of investigative journalism by the the Fuller Project, which reports on global issues affecting women, and the New York Times. The Brutality of Sugar: Debt, Child Marriage and Hysterectomies is worthy of your time.

The year-long extension of the 2023 farm bill gives us a big window of opportunity to re-frame sugar reform as an environmental and social justice matter. We are working every day to educate legislators on the sugar industry, its misdeeds, and the ways the federal government, through the sugar program, is complicit in those misdeeds.

According to a careful new analysis from human rights watchdog The Corporate Accountability Lab, the Fanjuls and Central Romana have turned to their familiar playbook: duck responsibility and pull strings. They've staffed up on lobbyists, leaned on old friends in the Biden administration, and most important, made shambolic change on the ground.

Federal agents have launched an investigation into Central Romana Corp., a major sugar exporter to the United States, owned by the Florida-based Fanjul family, over allegations of forced labor.

In August, Alfy Fanjul sent this letter to his "friend" Dodd, asking him to help lift a ban on imports from Fanjul’s Dominican sugar plantation. The US Customs and Border Protection imposed the ban last November due to forced labor—“the closest thing I’ve ever seen to modern slavery,” said Michigan Congressman Dan Kildee, who visited the plantation in 2022.

Which brings us to today. We are asking for Secretary Vilsack to help put an end to the civil rights violation that is sugarcane burning. Will he stand on the side of positive change and reform, or will he support the toxic status quo?

When the wind blows toward largely Black communities, the state allows sugar growers to burn. When the wind blows toward largely white communities, sugar growers are not allowed to burn. Black communities are thus deprived of protection from the impact of sugarcane smoke and ash—protections their white counterparts benefit from.

Most legislators had never heard a case for sugar reform on the basis of social justice, the environment, or human rights. That's all changing—right now. We are reshaping how America's legislative leaders view the sugar industry and laying the groundwork for change.

It's hard to imagine hardworking, honest, tax-paying sugar beet farmers — like Kildee's constituents or the good people of Kimball, MN — want anything to do with the Fanjuls and modern slavery. But the sugar program couples them together. They are inextricably linked — and therefore, complicit.

A new study from a Harvard graduate student adds to the case for ending sugarcane burning. The study includes a cost-benefit analysis of alternatives to sugarcane burning: replacing sugarcane harvesters with a more efficient approach; processing the cane "trash" into biofuel for resale; and planting a "cover crop" during the fallow year to stabilize soil, prevent nutrient loss prevention, and control pests. The study concludes there are multiple ways to reform the industry that "result in a prosperous sustainable symbiotic future for the sugarcane industry and the environment."

Big Sugar's claims are misleading, but irrefutable evidence is mounting. In a peer-reviewed study, Florida State University researchers find sugarcane burning produces roughly 5,000 tons of particulate matter per year. That's as much as the total annual emissions of every motor vehicle in the state of Florida.

Air pollution of that concentration kills. The FSU team finds mortality rates from this exposure almost 10 times higher for residents living next to the fields than for those outside the immediate area. That amounts to one to six deaths per year as a result of sugarcane burning emissions.

From NBC News by Patrice Gaines

After Florida State University published a study about the effects of burning sugar cane on marginalized communities, residents say it’s time to stop the practice.

Photo by Greg Lovett / The Palm Beach Post / USA Today Network

It was a crystal-clear, get-outside kind of day in south Florida last Friday. With one exception: in the working-class, largely Black communities surrounded by sugarcane fields, places like Belle Glade and Clewiston. Residents of those places experienced a day-long smoky twilight. Many stayed inside to avoid breathing cane ash, a toxic substance known as black snow.

We're writing to ask for your help today in shaping sugar industry reform. This action will take three minutes.

Increasing attention on the harm and hypocrisy of sugarcane burning in working-class, largely Black communities.

Growing concern over toxic red tides and their impact on marine life, water safety and livelihoods in a treasured region of our country.

Widening recognition — thanks to action by the US Customs and Border Protection agency — that Big Sugar is responsible for modern slavery on a plantation in the Dominican Republic.

Florida is bracing for a major algae bloom this spring —potentially at the scale of 'Toxic 2018.' That's the year months-long blue-green algae blooms choked the state's coasts, killing marine life, damaging the Everglades, and wounding the state's tourism, recreation and real estate sectors.

Big Sugar, it won't surprise you, is behind the blooms. Captains for Clean Water, a grassroots nonprofit, has a helpful breakdown of how the sugar industry's phosphate-laden runoff pollutes Lake Okeechobee, the Everglades, and Florida's coastlines.